picture of bill's head in a jarWhat's In Bill's Head?

Posts for Category Profanity!

Clyster-pipe update

 Posted by Bill on June 15, 2010 at 1:40 am
Jun 152010
 

In a recent post I advocated for the use of “clyster-pipe” as a general-purpose insult, and also briefly discussed the growing popularity of “douchebag.”

Over at Throw Grammar from the Train last week, Jan Freeman wrote about “the steady progress of the insult douchebag,” which she describes as “the latest reminder that our collective choice of language taboos is nothing if not arbitrary.”

She concludes with this:

So here we are, with douchebag, douche, d-bag, douchebaggery, all causing head-scratching at the classier print media, all based on an innocuous and semi-obsolete contraption. Just think: Had linguistic events taken a slightly different course, the latest insult might be truss or enema or tampon or mouthwash. Of course, it’s not too late; maybe their turn will come.

Clyster-pipe, Jan. Clyster-pipe!

 

Attention: Don’t be a clyster-pipe

 Posted by Bill on May 25, 2010 at 9:13 am
May 252010
 

A clyster-pipe in action

When you were a kid, you probably called people “retards” when they did something stupid or awkward or were otherwise in need of being insulted. In my neighborhood (in Phoenix), we called them “gompers” instead. If you’re a member of the Texas school board, you may be cheering the fact that we insulted people by branding them as labor organizers, but in fact the only thing we knew about Samuel Gompers was that there was a school for people with developmental disabilities named after him, and if I remember correctly, it was right next to my elementary school. So we were calling people “retards” as well, in our own localized slang.* (I don’t know if the expression was widely used all over Phoenix, or just common in my neighborhood. I was somehow surprised that the Urban Dictionary has an entry for this usage of the word.)

These days, many of us realize that we shouldn’t call people “retards,” because this usage is offensive to people who actually are retarded (in the clinical sense of the word) and to those who care about them. Of course, we’re not supposed to call retarded people retarded, either, because of the negative connotations the word has taken on through its non-clinical use. Eventually the word will lose its original literal, clinical meaning, and we’ll go back to happily using it as an insult, just as we do with “idiot,” “imbecile,” and “moron,” which all were once clinical terms. In the meantime, though, no one can use “retard” in any context at all (you probably shouldn’t even apply fire retardant, to be safe).

This illustrates one of the biggest challenges of life in our present Age of Enlightenment: how do you insult someone without accidentally offending the wrong people?

Continue reading »

 

Hey, man, cuck you and your socks

 Posted by Bill on August 15, 2006 at 11:37 am
Aug 152006
 

During a recent instant messaging conversation, a friend made a comment that required a reply along the lines of “that’s too bad.” “That’s too bad” not being quite my style (or perhaps not quite strong enough for the occasion), I replied, “that’s a real fucker.” Or rather, I meant to reply, “that’s a real fucker,” but I missed the f and instead typed “that’s a real cucker.” I corrected myself but then thought, “perhaps it could be a real cucker.

A quick trip to the OED told me that cuck is an obsolete intransitive verb meaning “to void excrement,” so a cucker is a shitter, and “that’s a real shitter” would have been a perfectly suitable expression of my opinion in this case.

The beauty of cucker is that it sounds obscene (because it sounds a lot like fucker) and is, I suppose, obscene, due to the idea it expresses, but you can use it without anyone knowing you’re being obscene. In addition to using it as a substitute for shit and shitter, I suggest you try using cuck and cucker as general-purpose expletives along the lines of fuck and fucker.

Amusingly, the online Urban Dictionary lists “sock cucker” as a spoonerism for “cock sucker,” indicating that it “is often used to veil the insult and make it appear less offensive or even to make it go undetected.” In fact the phrase inadvertently creates a novel (and much funnier) insult.

Digression

The Urban Dictionary describes itself as “a slang dictionary with your definitions.” Contributor Salt Licky clearly doesn’t quite grasp the meaning of “slang,” as he (I think we can safely assume he is a he, based on his other contributions) has contributed the phrase “sock drawer,” meaning “the drawer that holds your socks.”